22 Quotable Quotes About Psychiatric Pseudoscience
By Gary G. Kohls, MD, guest to Natural Blaze
Most of the following quotes come from the thorough, extended article entitled âPsychiatry: Science or Fraud?â
âAll tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.â â Thomas Jefferson
âBad men need nothing more to compass their ends than that good men should look on and do nothing.â ââ John Stuart Mill
âBad men need nothing more to compass their ends than that good men should look on and do nothing.â ââ John Stuart Mill
â[The DSM] is the fabrication upon which psychiatry seeks acceptance by medicine in general. Insiders know it is more a political than scientific document. To its credit it says so, although its brief apologia is rarely noted⊠Some take it seriously, others more realistically. It is the way to get paid⊠The issue is what do the categories tell us? Do they in fact accurately represent the person with a problem? They donât, and canât, because there are no external validating criteria for psychiatric diagnoses. There is neither a blood test nor specific anatomic lesions for any major psychiatric disorder. So, where are we? [The American Psychiatric Association] as an organization has implicitly (sometimes explicitly as well) bought into a theoretical hoax. Is psychiatry a hoaxâas practised today? Unfortunately, the answer is mostly yes.â â Loren Mosher, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, and Chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia in the (US) National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, 1968â1980), and ex-American Psychiatric Association (APA) member
âModern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illnessâŠPatients [have] been diagnosed with âchemical imbalancesâ despite the fact that no test exists to support such a claim, andâŠthere is no real conception of what a correct chemical âbalanceâ would look like.â â Dr. David Kaiser, Psychiatrist (US)
âWhile there has been âno shortage of alleged biochemical explanations for psychiatric conditionsâŠnot one has been proven. Quite the contrary. In every instance where such an imbalance was thought to have been found, it was later proven false ⊠No claim for a gene for a psychiatric condition has stood the test of time, in spite of popular misinformation.â â Dr. Joseph Glenmullen, US psychiatrist, Harvard University Medical School and author of âProzac Backlashâ
âThere is a great deal of scientific evidence that stimulants cause brain damage with long-term use, yet there is no evidence that these mental illnessesâŠexist.ââŠâDespite more than two hundred years of intensive research, no commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders have proven to be either genetic or biological in origin, including schizophrenia, major depression, manic-depressive disorder, the various anxiety disorders, and childhood disorders such as attention-deficit hyperactivity. At present there are no known biochemical imbalances in the brain of typical psychiatric patientsâuntil they are given psychiatric drugs.â â Dr. Peter Breggin, US Psychiatrist and author of many books on the subject of psychiatric fraud, including âToxic Psychiatryâ, âYour Drug May Be Your Problemâ, âBrain Disabling Treatments in Psychiatryâ, âTalking Back to Prozacâ, etc
Thereâs actually in fact dozens of studies showing that there isnât any measurable imbalance, so [for example] psychiatrists will explain to patients all the time, âthis is just like diabetes, in diabetes you have low insulin, we have to readjust the insulin level, in depression you have low serotonin, we have to readjust the serotonin levelâ, but actually we have already proven that there is nothing wrong with the serotonin levels, itâs completely a myth disproven by our own evidence.â â Dr. Colin Ross, Psychiatrist, President of the International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation (Canada)
âWithin a few months of starting psychiatry, I was realizing there was something seriously wrong with it. It was immediately obvious to me that the psychiatrists were making claimsâŠwhich simply were not justified in biology. But if you stand up and say that: âwhat you are doing, ladies and gentleman, is not science, itâs pseudoscienceâ, then you are challenging whatâs holding the whole profession togetherâŠI think secretly [psychiatrists] know, deep inside, that if anybody criticizes this or examines this too closely it might fall apart. ThisâŠwhole mess is held in place by the single injunction that âmental disorders are brain disordersâ. That false claim is the single intellectual hook that holds this edifice in the air, that stops it all collapsing in a heap. They just make this claim: âmental disease is brain diseaseâ, but that, as Iâve said, is an ideological claim. People are being told: âyou have a chemical imbalance of the brain, which is genetically determined, and youâve got it for life, and thereâs nothing you can do about it, and you will forever be limited and restricted and you must take these tablets, which will dampen your creativity, your sensitivity, your awareness, and your sexuality, youâve gotta do this because youâre âsickâ, and we can see it, but you canât. Now that to me is the catastrophe that has to be exposed.â ââ Dr. Niall McLaren, Psychiatrist, Former head of Dept. of Psychiatry, Repatriation Hospital, (Australia)
âWhen psychiatrists label a child [or adult], theyâre labeling people because of symptoms. They do not have any pathological diagnosis; they do not have any laboratory diagnosis; they cannot show any differentiation that would back up the diagnosis of these psychiatric âdiseasesâ. Whereas if you have a heart attack, you can find the lesion; if you have diabetes, your blood sugar is very high; if you have arthritis it will show on the X-ray. In psychiatry, itâs just crystal-balling, fortune-telling. Itâs totally unscientific.â â Julian Whitaker, MD (US)
âI think the use of so-called âpsychiatric treatmentâ is very effective as a political weapon in controlling the massesâŠIf we were to have a mandatory âmental health screeningâ as they like to call it, not only of all young people in school but all adults and everybody, it would become a terribly effective tool in the hands of totalitarians because surely you could find something in everybodyâs questionnaire if they answer questions honestly: âHave you ever had feelings of anxiety or sadness?â; âAre you ever unhappy with what the government does?â⊠When you look at the area of psychiatry it becomes particularly worrisome because many people are not sensitised to the political implications of using that fieldâŠIf weâre not willing to challenge and if weâre already afraid that somebodyâs going to put this label around us, then weâve already lost, thereâs no turning it around⊠the time has come for us to stand on our conviction, to know what is right, to take the risks and stand for freedom.â â G. Edward Griffin
Price Disclaimer
âWhile DSM has been described as a âBibleâ for the field, it is, at best, a dictionary⊠The weakness is its lack of validity. Unlike our definitions of ischemic heart disease, lymphoma, or AIDS, the DSM diagnoses are based on a consensus about clusters of clinical symptoms, not any objective laboratory measure. In the rest of medicine, this would be equivalent to creating diagnostic systems based on the nature of chest pain or the quality of fever.â â Thomas Insel, MD, the Director of the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (Dr Insel stepped down from the NIMH in 2015)
âI want no part of a psychiatry of oppression and social control. âBiologically based brain diseasesâ are certainly convenient for families and practitioners alike. It is no fault insurance against personal responsibility. We are all just (supposedly) helplessly caught up in a swirl of brain pathology for which no one, except DNA, is responsible⊠The fact that there is no evidence confirming the brain disease attribution is, at this point, irrelevant. What we are dealing with here is fashion, politics and money. This level of intellectual /scientific dishonesty is just too egregious for me to continue to support by my membership.â â Loren Mosher, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, and Chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia in the (US) National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, 1968â1980), and ex-American Psychiatric Association (APA) member
âI believe, until the public and psychiatry itself see that DSM labels are not only useless as medical âdiagnosesâ but also have the potential to do great harmâparticularly when they are used as means to deny individual freedoms, or as weapons by psychiatrists acting as hired guns for the legal system.â â Dr. Sydney Walker III, Neuropsychiatrist (US) and author of âThe Sherlock Holmes of Neurologyâ
Price Disclaimer
âMore and more problems have been redefined as âdisordersâ or âillnessesâ, supposedly caused by genetic predispositions and biochemical imbalances. Life events are relegated to mere triggers of an underlying biological time-bomb. Feeling very sad has become âdepressive disorderâ. Worrying too much is âanxiety disorderâ. Excessive gambling, drinking, drug use or eating are also illnesses. So are eating, sleeping, or having sex too little. Being painfully shy has become âavoidant personality disorderâ. Beating people up is âintermittent explosive disorderâ. Our Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has 886 pages of such illnesses. ⊠Making lists of behaviors, applying medical-sounding labels to people who engage in them, then using the presence of those behaviors to prove they have the illness in question is scientifically meaningless. It tells us nothing about causes or solutions. It does, however, create the âreassuringâ feeling that something medical is going on.â â John Read, Professor of Clinical Psychology (US)
Price Disclaimer
âThe fact of the matter is that there is no such disease (objective abnormality = disease) as ADHD. It is a contrived, faux disease â an illusion. This being the case, children said to have it are normal/disease-free and giving them ADHD drugs, or any psychiatric drugs, is not treatment, but poisoning. Once Ritalin or any psychiatric drug courses through their body, they are, for the first time, physically, neurologically, biologically, abnormal.ââŠâSaying any psychiatric diagnosisâŠis a brain-based problem and that the medications are normalizing functionâ, is an anti-scientific, pro-drug, lie â one that reflects FDA and government policy generally.ââŠâThere is nothing more despicable than a physician who knowingly tells normal patients that they are âsickâ, âillâ, or âdiseasedâ, for profit. Yet this has become standard practice throughout medicine.ââŠâYou at the FDA mandate the medical treatment of ADHD. Where is the proof that ADHD is a disease? Give us that reference, that citation. Right now please. Give us the reference-citation to the examination or test that demonstrates an objective abnormality child-by-child. The members of the panel provided me with no such references/citations either at the time of my request or at any time before, during, or after the day-long conference.â â Dr. Fred Baughman, Jr, Pediatric Neurologist (US), (from testimony at the [FDA] meeting of the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, 2006)
âAll psychiatrists have in common that when they are caught on camera or on microphone, they cower and admit that there are no such things as chemical imbalances/diseases, or examinations or tests for them. What they do in practice, lying in every instance, is abrogating the informed consent right of every patient and poisoning them in the name of âtreatmentâ is nothing short of criminal.â â Fred Baughman Jr., Pediatric Neurologist (US)
âNo behavior or misbehavior is a disease, nor can it be a disease. Thatâs not what diseases are. Diseases are malfunctions of the human body, of the heart, the liver, the kidney, the brain. Typhoid fever is a disease. Spring fever is not a disease; it is a figure of speech, a metaphoric disease. All mental diseases are metaphoric diseases, misrepresented as real diseases and mistaken for real diseases.â â Thomas Szasz, Professor of Psychiatry Emeritus
âPsychiatry [makes] unproven claims that depression, bipolar illness, anxiety, alcoholism and a host of other disorders are in fact primarily biologic and probably genetic in origin⊠This kind of faith in science and progress is staggering, not to mention naĂŻve and perhaps even delusional.â⊠âIt has occurred to me with forcible irony that psychiatry has quite literally lost its mind, and along with it the minds of the patients they are presumably supposed to care for.â â David Kaiser, Psychiatrist (US)
âIn short, the whole business of creating psychiatric categories of âdiseaseâ, formalizing them with consensus, and subsequently ascribing diagnostic codes to them, which in turn leads to their use for insurance billing, is nothing but an extended racket furnishing psychiatry a pseudo-scientific aura. The perpetrators are, of course, feeding at the public trough.â â Dr. Thomas Dorman, Internist and member of the Royal College of Physicians (UK)
âThese people have no ethics at all. Theyâre morally bankrupt. Theyâre like the grave robbers in old England who provided cadavers for the medical schools.â â Paul McDevitt, Mental Health Counsellor (US)
Price Disclaimer
âLegal, synthetic, dependency-inducing and increasingly unaffordable, brain-altering, intoxicating prescription psych drugs, just like their illegal, addictive, dependency-inducing, unaffordable, brain-altering, and intoxicating counterparts on the street, can permanently damage the brain cells and circuits. But neither the legal psych drugs nor the illegal street drugs ever cure anything. Perhaps the most nefarious difference between the legal drugs and the illegal drugs is that the legal ones create permanent, brain-altered, addicted patients for often well-meaning practitioners and the pharmaceutical industry, while the illegal drugs create permanent, brain-altered junkies for street-level dealers. That reality is great for both businesspersons, whether legal or illicit, but bad for the addicted user/abuser.â ⊠âIatrogenic, prescription-drug-induced suicidality, incidentally, is just one of the hundreds of adverse drug-effects that Big Pharma, Big Medicine, Big Media and almost all of our elected, Big Pharma-bribed legislators refuse to acknowledge. To the members of those groups, the drug-addicted junkie that over-dosed in the alley with a dirty needle in his arm is just an easily over-looked personal immorality issue for despised.â â Gary G. Kohls MD, Holistic Mental Health Practitioner (US)
â[While there has been] no shortage of alleged biochemical explanations for psychiatric conditionsâŠnot one has been proven. Quite the contrary. In every instance where such an imbalance was thought to have been found, it was later proven false.ââŠâNo claim for a gene for a psychiatric condition has stood the test of time, in spite of popular misinformation.â â Joseph Glenmullen, Harvard University Psychiatrist (US) and author of âProzac Backlashâ
Top Illustration: Alexander Barsky
Read more from Dr. Gary Kohls
Dr. Kohls is a retired physician who practiced holistic, non-drug, mental health care for the last decade of his forty year family practice career. He is a contributor to and an endorser of the efforts of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (www.cchrint.org) and, while still actively practicing medicine, was a member of Mind Freedom International (http://www.mindfreedom.org/),the International Society for Ethical Psychology and Psychiatry (http://psychintegrity.com) and the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (https://www.istss.org).
In the first decade of the 21st century, while still practicing medicine, Dr Kohls taught a graduate level psychology course at the University of Minnesota at Duluth. It was titled âThe Science and Psychology of the Body-Mind Connectionâ.
While running his independent clinic, Dr Kohls published over 400 issues of his Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter, which was emailed to a variety of subscribers, patients and patient advocates. (The PPENs have not been archived at any website as of this writing.)
Since his retirement, Dr Kohls has been writing a weekly column (titled âDuty to Warnâ) for the Duluth Reader, an alternative newsweekly published in Duluth, Minnesota. He offers teaching seminars to the public and to healthcare professionals.
Please help us out by sharing!
No comments:
Post a Comment